|
|
Post by ironman on Feb 25, 2005 19:42:38 GMT 1
ermm no post just a head line...
well its clear what they will attack Iran.. or syria..
|
|
|
|
Post by JNK on Feb 25, 2005 20:45:04 GMT 1
USA can also attack to North-Korea.  |
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Feb 25, 2005 21:12:32 GMT 1
USA can also attack to North-Korea. hahhahaha yeah sure..lol lol lol they wouldt dare cos them North Koreans will shoot a Nuke by the fist sign of trouble.. no america goes after the small weak countries, they dotn fight a country that is equel or stronger.. |
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Feb 25, 2005 21:34:17 GMT 1
i think that usa attack Iran or Pakistan and i think that they dont attack north korea  |
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Feb 26, 2005 10:32:08 GMT 1
i think that usa attack Iran or Pakistan and i think that they dont attack north korea ermm pakistand is a allied nation in the war against international terrorism, and besides that pakistand is also a nucliar nation so they wont get attacked.. why do you think every country in the world that hanst got one wants a nuke..so America will leave them alone.. by going to war america started a new arms race.. |
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Feb 26, 2005 11:18:53 GMT 1
you dont have fully right because Usa attack countrys where they can earn money and in North Korea thers no money no oil and in Pakistan is gold and oil and i think that usa attack Pakistan |
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Feb 26, 2005 12:32:03 GMT 1
you dont have fully right because Usa attack countrys where they can earn money and in North Korea thers no money no oil and in Pakistan is gold and oil and i think that usa attack Pakistan pakistan is a allied nation they wont.. but iran has oil.. so has syria and they dont have nukes... |
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Feb 26, 2005 13:43:04 GMT 1
The eternal battle for resources,fuel and energy...
How many ppl die over it ...
|
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Feb 26, 2005 14:37:27 GMT 1
will see who they will usa atack I think that many peole die because america need oil and they dont stop at Iraq too many ???i think...
|
|
|
|
Post by street on Feb 27, 2005 8:08:41 GMT 1
hehe stop it lets wait when USA gomes out from Iraq  |
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Feb 27, 2005 20:38:35 GMT 1
history will show us true about USA and Iraq  |
|
|
|
Post by m4st3r on Mar 4, 2005 1:06:54 GMT 1
My bets are on Kuwait. Nuff said
|
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Mar 4, 2005 19:09:07 GMT 1
My bets are on Kuwait. Nuff said no its imposyble that they attack Kuwejt because its neutral and its helping Usa with Iraq  |
|
|
|
Post by m4st3r on Mar 4, 2005 22:33:53 GMT 1
Piurek, nothing is impossible. If you remember, Saddam had a lot of shit going on in Kuwait, and some fighting was done there before. Isn't his psycho brother still loose somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Mar 5, 2005 0:03:08 GMT 1
Piurek, nothing is impossible. If you remember, Saddam had a lot of shit going on in Kuwait, and some fighting was done there before. Isn't his psycho brother still loose somewhere? Mayby nothing is imposyble in stupid bush head |
|
|
|
Post by street on Mar 9, 2005 17:15:01 GMT 1
yeah bush is stupid!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Mar 9, 2005 21:47:38 GMT 1
look at his face:)   lol ;D |
|
Rebel
Corperal
a rebel is not a terrorist, a rebel is a fighter for freedom
Posts: 98
|
Post by Rebel on Mar 9, 2005 21:52:39 GMT 1
omg isn't it more that he is playing with himself in the second picture thinking about the first?
|
|
|
|
Post by Piurek on Mar 10, 2005 1:25:47 GMT 1
omg isn't it more that he is playing with himself in the second picture thinking about the first? dont know but mayby he is too stupid to think baout something else he is thing about himslef all the time   |
|
|
|
Post by Ricardus on Mar 10, 2005 21:20:35 GMT 1
Who will the USA attack next?
Well, the USA is divided on who to attack next. The 'Administration' would like to attack Iran next (no doubt about it) and will have instructed military planners to draw up plans to do just that. They would like to attack Iran to satisfy their backers (U.S. Oil Corporation interests) However,
The U.S. Military will be extremely reluctant to attack anyone right now. The war on Iraq is far from over and the troops they have deployed there right now are being stretched to the limit. In the US itself Military recruiters are finding it difficult to recruit (even amongst the traditional poor and unemployed labour pool) so - looking at the logistical element of Military planning - they will be extremely wary of attacking anyone while they have unfinished business elsewhere.
The US is building up a sizeable military presence in the middle east so it makes sense (from a logistical viewpoint) to attack someone where you already have concentration of force (the principle of concentration of force) They just don't have the means (or the budget) to make it fly.
As for North Korea - this is just US posturing against 'Baddies' and nothing more. There is simply nothing to gain from attacking them (unless you believe that the US goes to war to 'protect us from baddies')
My bet is that there is a lot of shouting, threatening and wringing of hands within the Whitehouse and the Military community at the moment and a very divided US attitude. If the war on Iraq had been the 'pushover' they expected it to have been - Iran would already have been invaded.
Ricardus
|
|
