|
|
Post by cheesecake on Sept 26, 2005 13:00:23 GMT 1
Okies there has to be at least one band that you all do not like !! ...so what band(s) do you not like ? For me i do not like the little boybands that seem to be produced on a mass these days, with there boring lyrics for 5year old kids !!...However i do like Mcfly ...as Dougie, Danny, and Harry are just hot...but that is another story   ... I also do not like the bands that are put together from TV shows, for exmaple, 'pop idle' and 'the X factor' ...Some bands have had to work bent over backwards to get where they are today, and these people go to an audition and vulla there famous !! ... However i have to say, maybe they have not had as many oppourtunities as other people, but surely if they were that good (which they tend not to be) they would have been discovered !!   |
|
|
|
Post by ironman on Sept 26, 2005 13:03:48 GMT 1
Re: What bands do you not like? All the music cheese send me over msn  wut a noise pollution  |
|
|
|
Post by JNK on Sept 26, 2005 13:06:55 GMT 1
I kind of like every music, but I hate some lyrics...
|
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Sept 26, 2005 13:12:41 GMT 1
Re: What bands do you not like? All the music cheese send me over msn wut a noise pollution hahahaha...i'll have you know, that they have very good lyrics and erhm music !! ...nuggets !!... |
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Sept 26, 2005 13:13:02 GMT 1
I kind of like every music, but I hate some lyrics... Do you have any examples of lyrics you do not like? |
|
|
|
Post by fr3sh on Sept 26, 2005 13:22:44 GMT 1
it all depends on my mood besides I can't say that i hate/don't like a certain band (there are some exceptions though...) for example the 'metallicats' (those who know... ) their songs were quite ok till 'load' after that... n/c... i hate pop as such (pop rock... wrrrr) and the new kid on the scene: punk-pop (the guy that came out with the idea is either deranged or too greedy) pop=popular, popular=making profit punk(at its roots)was uncommercial, even now there're bands that play punk, the real thing... not for splendor, money or whatsoever... but they are unknown to the wider public, why? because they're un-pop... and when I see a kid about 14-15 on the street with an iroquois on his head (made in the best barber shop), boots worth more then 100 euros and clothes from top notch stores (also damn expensive) and I see smth written on his backpack (also expensive) 'greenday' or some other band 'we-dont-care-what-we-sing-about-we-just-get-paid-for-it-a-lot'... and you ask that young 'man' what do you listen to? he answers 'only the best punk'.. then i ask 'what do you mean by 'best'?' 'only those bands that are on the charts...' popular punk rock... it makes me wanna kill... everything that's called rebelous is unrebelous that it should be called pop but hell that's what going on right now, there is this fashion to show how defiant u are, the more defiant the better!! sorry if i said anything bad about your preffered bands, but that's just what I feel... if the post is too weird and inconsistant please accept my appologies... music is just one of those things that i live for En taro A'dun |
|
|
|
Post by cheesecake on Sept 26, 2005 14:10:59 GMT 1
it all depends on my mood besides I can't say that i hate/don't like a certain band (there are some exceptions though...) for example the 'metallicats' (those who know... ) their songs were quite ok till 'load' after that... n/c... i hate pop as such (pop rock... wrrrr) and the new kid on the scene: punk-pop (the guy that came out with the idea is either deranged or too greedy) pop=popular, popular=making profit punk(at its roots)was uncommercial, even now there're bands that play punk, the real thing... not for splendor, money or whatsoever... but they are unknown to the wider public, why? because they're un-pop... and when I see a kid about 14-15 on the street with an iroquois on his head (made in the best barber shop), boots worth more then 100 euros and clothes from top notch stores (also damn expensive) and I see smth written on his backpack (also expensive) 'greenday' or some other band 'we-dont-care-what-we-sing-about-we-just-get-paid-for-it-a-lot'... and you ask that young 'man' what do you listen to? he answers 'only the best punk'.. then i ask 'what do you mean by 'best'?' 'only those bands that are on the charts...' popular punk rock... it makes me wanna kill... everything that's called rebelous is unrebelous that it should be called pop but hell that's what going on right now, there is this fashion to show how defiant u are, the more defiant the better!! sorry if i said anything bad about your preffered bands, but that's just what I feel... if the post is too weird and inconsistant please accept my appologies... music is just one of those things that i live for En taro A'dun I one-hundred % agree with you fresh...i see so many people skipping from trend to trend because it is popular at the time, then once they have finished with a trend, they laugh at it !! ...It annoys me when people say they don't like something then 2days later because it's a trend "oh i love them/it" ...hmm oh well, some people are just like that, i guess |
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Sept 26, 2005 15:55:24 GMT 1
i defintly dont like slovenian pop singers i mean the girl is half naked on the stage . and hear voice sound like crap so any pop singer had a buty surgery who da hell wats to look on a half naked plastic barby
not me !!
|
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Sept 26, 2005 18:06:12 GMT 1
Yea i agree too
I HATE POP\ROCK , R&B ,Rap ,Hip Hop and the corrupted (not)Punk music.
I like the general message of the real punk music even tho it doesn't suit my taste.
Also (not hate) i dint like the old heavy metal\hard rock
its just boring for my taste but maybe just Cox I'm still young(guitars just scream high tones and singer just scream like girls but who knows i will maybe change my thoughts about this music.Non the less these musicians are good musicians).
As i said I like some types of metal:
-Hard Core
-some Industrial
-Black (NOT SATANIC - Death metal is satanic)
-Melodic
-some New Metal
-and some bands that play trash/grind core metal
-some power progressive
|
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Sept 26, 2005 18:07:35 GMT 1
En taro A'dun templar. ^^ |
|
|
|
Post by germanwunderkind on Sept 26, 2005 18:40:23 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Zecristo on Sept 26, 2005 19:49:06 GMT 1
Down with the Rolling Stones...
Some of PLC's dinossaurs may remember them...
|
|
|
|
Post by flying on Sept 26, 2005 19:50:34 GMT 1
Down with the Rolling Stones... Some of PLC's dinossaurs may remember them... Yay!!!! Mick Jagger should get a day job! |
|
|
|
Post by fr3sh on Sept 26, 2005 20:08:41 GMT 1
you don't have to respect the rolling stones but u must admit that satisfaction changed smth, dont ask me, i dont know what it changed but it did change smth and for 'angie' they all should be torn to pices my life for Aiur  tisk tisk tisk... Black metal is satanic (vader, behemoth, darkane, carpathian forest-the 1st 2 are even polish ) death isn't that satanic but most of that satanism is only when on stage and in the lyrics... those are posers those bastards read LaVey and think they met satan... :buahahaha: all of them forget that even if satan exists he exists thanks to God oh and just a reminder: Satan, a.k.a. Lucipher (the one that hold the light) was the 1st of angels, but he rebeled when he discovered that God gave us (humans) a soul and a free will... for that act of treachery he was banished from heaven and controls hell now... and he acts when God permits him to... therefore he remains a LOYAL servant to god... I talked with more so called satanists then I should most of them only seen the title page of lavey's book, I think. why do i think so? cause I quoted things that were not there and they believed me... power of the mind... and a qoute from somewhere (dont remember from where...) Hell isn't full of sulfur and devils trying to boil you alive. Hell is the lack of God's voice... so I ask of you, are we in hell? |
|
|
|
Post by flying on Sept 26, 2005 20:19:15 GMT 1
[...] oh and just a reminder: Satan, a.k.a. Lucipher (the one that hold the light) was the 1st of angels, but he rebeled when he discovered that God gave us (humans) a soul and a free will... for that act of treachery he was banished from heaven and controls hell now... and he acts when God permits him to... therefore he remains a LOYAL servant to god... [...] Yes, but... Did you know that: a) Satan means, basically, "the enemy"? b) Lucifer means, basically, "the light bringer", or "the light bearer"? (well, you knew that) c) the Holy Grail is supposed to be cut from the main jewel of Lucifer's crown, which fell to Earth allong with him? and, for the piéce of resistance... wait for it... d) Lucifer's main occupation when in Heaven was to write songs to praise the Lord? I still wonder why we, an alledgely godless generation, craving for Soma but not for questions, give these Heavenly/Hellish matters such importance?! Anyway, and if I chose to stroll down fantasy lane and forget about the writings of Zecharia Sitchin about the "gods" of Mesopotamia, I tend very strongly to agree with you when you say that Lucifer remains a loyal subject to all-mighty God in Heaven. I have some twisted theories about that, including how and why the Bible was written; good fun, as long as we keep in mind that it is all pretty much phylosophical speculation... |
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Sept 26, 2005 21:43:28 GMT 1
you don't have to respect the rolling stones but u must admit that satisfaction changed smth, dont ask me, i dont know what it changed but it did change smth and for 'angie' they all should be torn to pices my life for Aiur tisk tisk tisk... Black metal is satanic (vader, behemoth, darkane, carpathian forest-the 1st 2 are even polish ) death isn't that satanic but most of that satanism is only when on stage and in the lyrics... those are posers those bastards read LaVey and think they met satan... :buahahaha: all of them forget that even if satan exists he exists thanks to God oh and just a reminder: Satan, a.k.a. Lucifer (the one that hold the light) was the 1st of angels, but he rebelled when he discovered that God gave us (humans) a soul and a free will... for that act of treachery he was banished from heaven and controls hell now... and he acts when God permits him to... therefore he remains a LOYAL servant to god... I talked with more so called satanists then I should most of them only seen the title page of lavey's book, I think. why do i think so? cause I quoted things that were not there and they believed me... power of the mind... and a qoute from somewhere (dont remember from where...) Hell isn't full of sulfur and devils trying to boil you alive. Hell is the lack of God's voice... so I ask of you, are we in hell? Doom to all threaten Home-world. I love the combat -Oops I always mix death and black metal. Yes Black metal is Satanic and Death Isn't I like death I don't like black RIGHT -Yea there are many many posers that just want ppl to fear the or find them weird or something (generally losers,idiots and mentally challenged) -However I don't believe in god and haven (i know the whole story) therefor i don't believe in satan\Lucifer\devil and hell so all that crap falls in to the water for all i care. I believe in some sort of great balance between good and evil (if we could all define good and evil) and that everything on this plant that it consists of should stay in that balance for the good of everyone and everything. -Life after death ? Well i don't have a believe or not in this question just the fact that at the end of my ,,road" i will find out. -If hypothetically speaking if there was a god,heaven,satan,hell, yes I would have to say this is hell. |
|
|
|
Post by fr3sh on Sept 26, 2005 22:00:08 GMT 1
good and evil and balance? smth like yin&yang?? yep, thought about it cause if there is violonce and decay (meaning evilness) goodness has to be somewhere!! how can we know that something is good if we do not know what's evil? yet there is the human factor... human beings are hard to be predicted for example i remember that I spoke with a friend that it is possible that bible is just a book like any other... why? too much fantasy in it (miracles are fantasy) and what's more important we considered the fact that it was rewritten a couple (at least) times already... and it might have been altered... (in good faith of course ) look at this example: there is this catastrophy: somebody starts to write a log of the survivors: 'Thank God John had a lighter' in couple of centuries because of rewritting it might have been altered to look smth like this: 'and then God sent John, the Chosen, fire' amusing? funny? possible? who knows... there are just 4 things certain in life: you are born, you're deceived, you pay tax and then u die... the question is whether I'm deceiving you now or am I showing the truth... |
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Sept 26, 2005 22:15:00 GMT 1
good and evil and balance? smth like yin&yang?? yep, thought about it cause if there is violonce and decay (meaning evilness) goodness has to be somewhere!! how can we know that something is good if we do not know what's evil? yet there is the human factor... human beings are hard to be predicted for example i remember that I spoke with a friend that it is possible that bible is just a book like any other... why? too much fantasy in it (miracles are fantasy) and what's more important we considered the fact that it was rewritten a couple (at least) times already... and it might have been altered... (in good faith of course ) look at this example: there is this catastrophy: somebody starts to write a log of the survivors: 'Thank God John had a lighter' in couple of centuries because of rewritting it might have been altered to look smth like this: 'and then God sent John, the Chosen, fire' amusing? funny? possible? who knows... there are just 4 things certain in life: you are born, you're deceived, you pay tax and then u die... the question is whether I'm deceiving you now or am I showing the truth... Yea something like Ying&yang Yea I am aware how are church books written(how else, by those who believe so much that they will write a book in ,,its glory") and how the bible has been rewritten to benefit those who had the power to rewrite it. For now I know that in our lives nothing is certain not even our coming to existence (birth) |
|
|
|
Post by fr3sh on Sept 27, 2005 0:13:03 GMT 1
true, yet we agrred that we are 'now' (we think, or at least we think that we think-was that logical??-, therefore we are...) and everything that is now had to 'become' earlier (we had to be born...) even if we assume, that the whole world is created in my, your or someone elses imagination we had to be created... so we can assume that either way we were born |
|
|
|
Post by SilentVoice on Sept 27, 2005 0:14:49 GMT 1
true, yet we agrred that we are 'now' (we think, or at least we think that we think-was that logical??-, therefore we are...) and everything that is now had to 'become' earlier (we had to be born...) even if we assume, that the whole world is created in my, your or someone elses imagination we had to be created... so we can assume that either way we were born Well if u mean like that born-created-came to existance than yes it is certain |
|
